 |
|
|
|||||
| « Previous thread | Next thread » |
Alan Caruba
March 26, 2008
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2357
The thing most people don't "get" is that the environmental movement is
relentless in the spreading of its lies. It never stops and it takes all
forms of action, all intended to indoctrinate a younger generation and
advance its agenda with an older one.
Take, for example, the plans for April Fool's Day by the Energy Action
Coalition, Rising Tide Network, and Rainforest Action Network. They have
come together to sponsor "Fossil Fools Day."
It is described as "an international day of protest focused on climate
change and energy issues." You may have noticed by now that the Greens
only rarely refer to "global warming" any more. The reason for this is
the way it is becoming increasingly difficult to convince anyone the
Earth is warming when it is subjected to huge blizzards like those that
occurred in China or the snow that fell in parts of South America where
it hasn't happened for decades.
The "Fossil Fuels"event will include not only bike rides and "green job
rallies", but "protests and civil disobedience at power plants, energy
companies, urban sprawl developers, Bank of America mass account
closures," and presumably a host of things that go beyond free speech
and will likely involve vandalism or worse.
These events are planned for "over 100 locations throughout the U.S.,
Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand."
You need to seriously contemplate what is being protested here:
electricity, housing and office developments, and transportation fuels
among other horrors of modern civilization. In other words, everything a
modern society needs to provide for the welfare of its population and
its economy.
Take away energy resources and these Fossil Fools protesters are quite
literally in the dark. Take away oil, natural gas, and coal, and we are
all back to an era when the only fuel was wood!
The news release I received said the reason for Fossil Fools Day was
that, "Leading climate scientists warn that dramatic reductions in
greenhouse gas emissions must begin immediately to avoid catastrophic
climate shifts."
Is this message getting a little "old" for you?
It is for lots of people, even if they are unaware that the main culprit
that environmentalists keep citing among greenhouse gases is carbon
dioxide. CO2 represents 0.038% of the Earth's atmosphere. It has next to
nothing to do with the climate. As for scientists, several hundred got
together in New York in early March to hold a two-day conference
debunking the global warming lies.
The Fossil Fuel protesters might was well complain about the Sun,
clouds, oceans, or volcanic activity which the real drivers of the Earth's
climate. They won't, of course, because to do so would make them look
completely idiotic.
So the climate change/global warming propaganda campaign goes on. The
victims are a new generation too young to know the truth and the rest of
us who must continue to point out what these Green barbarians are doing
to advance this greatest of modern hoaxes.
--
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
". researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Solar Research in Germany
report the sun has been burning more brightly over the last 60 years,
accounting for the 1 degree Celsius increase in Earth's temperature over
the last 100 years."
http://ibdeditorial.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=28727941
2587175
"Lloyd" <l...@e...edu> wrote in message
news:f598cab4-7aa8-47a4-82c6-344581244c76@e67g2000hs
a.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 27, 12:21 am, "00BNZ" <0...@d...com> wrote:
>> Alan Caruba
>>
>> March 26, 2008
>>
>> http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2357
>>
>> The thing most people don't "get" is that the environmental movement
>> is
>> relentless in the spreading of its lies. It never stops and it takes
>> all
>> forms of action, all intended to indoctrinate a younger generation
>> and
>> advance its agenda with an older one.
>>
>> Take, for example, the plans for April Fool's Day by the Energy
>> Action
>> Coalition, Rising Tide Network, and Rainforest Action Network. They
>> have
>> come together to sponsor "Fossil Fools Day."
>>
>> It is described as "an international day of protest focused on
>> climate
>> change and energy issues." You may have noticed by now that the
>> Greens
>> only rarely refer to "global warming" any more. The reason for this
>> is
>> the way it is becoming increasingly difficult to convince anyone the
>> Earth is warming when it is subjected to huge blizzards like those
>> that
>> occurred in China or the snow that fell in parts of South America
>> where
>> it hasn't happened for decades.
>>
>> The "Fossil Fuels"event will include not only bike rides and "green
>> job
>> rallies", but "protests and civil disobedience at power plants,
>> energy
>> companies, urban sprawl developers, Bank of America mass account
>> closures," and presumably a host of things that go beyond free speech
>> and will likely involve vandalism or worse.
>>
>> These events are planned for "over 100 locations throughout the U.S.,
>> Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand."
>>
>> You need to seriously contemplate what is being protested here:
>> electricity, housing and office developments, and transportation
>> fuels
>> among other horrors of modern civilization. In other words,
>> everything a
>> modern society needs to provide for the welfare of its population and
>> its economy.
>>
>> Take away energy resources and these Fossil Fools protesters are
>> quite
>> literally in the dark. Take away oil, natural gas, and coal, and we
>> are
>> all back to an era when the only fuel was wood!
>>
>> The news release I received said the reason for Fossil Fools Day was
>> that, "Leading climate scientists warn that dramatic reductions in
>> greenhouse gas emissions must begin immediately to avoid catastrophic
>> climate shifts."
>>
>> Is this message getting a little "old" for you?
>>
>> It is for lots of people, even if they are unaware that the main
>> culprit
>> that environmentalists keep citing among greenhouse gases is carbon
>> dioxide. CO2 represents 0.038% of the Earth's atmosphere. It has next
>> to
>> nothing to do with the climate. As for scientists, several hundred
>> got
>> together in New York in early March to hold a two-day conference
>> debunking the global warming lies.
>>
>> The Fossil Fuel protesters might was well complain about the Sun,
>> clouds, oceans, or volcanic activity which the real drivers of the
>> Earth's
>> climate. They won't, of course, because to do so would make them look
>> completely idiotic.
>>
>> So the climate change/global warming propaganda campaign goes on. The
>> victims are a new generation too young to know the truth and the rest
>> of
>> us who must continue to point out what these Green barbarians are
>> doing
>> to advance this greatest of modern hoaxes.
>> --
>>
>> Warmest Regards
>>
>> Bonzo
>>
>> ". researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Solar Research in
>> Germany
>> report the sun has been burning more brightly over the last 60 years,
>> accounting for the 1 degree Celsius increase in Earth's temperature
>> over
>> the last 100
>> years."http://ibdeditorial.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=2
87279412587175
>
> Does anybody (except maybe John McCain) remember the last time Bonzo
> quoted a scientific source?
How's this???
No Scientific Consensus On Climate Change
Klaus-Martin Schulte
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT VOLUME 19 No. 2 2008
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/pap
ers/reprint/schulte_two_colmun_fomat.pdf
Abstract
FEAR of anthropogenic "global warming" can
adversely affect patients' well-being.
Accordingly, the state of the scientific consensus
about climate change was studied by a review of
539 papers on "global climate change" found
the Web of Science database from January
2004 to mid-February 2007, updating research
Oreskes (2004), who had reported that
between 1993 and 2003 none of 928 scientific
papers on "global climate change" had rejected
consensus that more than half of the warming
the past 50 years was likely to have been
anthropogenic. In the present review, 31 papers
6% of the sample) explicitly or implicitly reject
consensus.
Though Oreskes said that 75% of
papers in her sample endorsed the consensus,
fewer than half now endorse it. Only 6% do so
explicitly. Only one paper refers to
catastrophic" climate change, but without
offering evidence.
There appears to be little
evidence in the learned journals to justify the
climate-change alarm that now harms patients.
--
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"The question scientists should now be asking is not how much it will
warm over the next 50 to 100 years, but why has it warmed so little
during the major carbon dioxide buildup?" Patrick J. Michaels,
Environmental Scientist , University of Virginia
On Apr 6, 2:27 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
<J...@E...com> wrote:
> "00BNZ" <0...@d...com> wrote
>
> >http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/pa
pers/reprint/schul...
>
> Produced by Fred Singer, who claimed that Phobos the moon of mars, was an
> alien spacecraft and who was employed by Big Tobacco to write opinion pieces
> that claimed that smoking didn't cause cancer.
>
> AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH.....
>
> MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
>
> NASA finds evidence of widespread Antarctic melting
> Last Updated: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 | 10:04 AM ET
>
> Rising temperatures two years ago led to widespread melting of snow cover in
> west Antarctica, according to scientists examining the impact of global
> warming on the icy continent.
>
> The melting of snow cover in regions in January 2005 was the most
> significant Antarctic melting seen since satellites began observing the
> continent three decades ago, NASA said Tuesday.
>
> NASA's QuikScat satellite detected extensive areas of snowmelt, shown in
> yellow and red, in west Antarctica in January 2005.
> (NASA/JPL) It was also the first major melting detected using NASA's
> QuikScat satellite, which can measure both accumulated snowfall and
> temperatures in various regions.
>
> The team of scientists found evidence of melting in regions not normally
> affected: up to 900 kilometres inland from the open ocean, farther than 85
> degrees south (within 500 kilometres of the South Pole) and higher than
> 2,000 metres above sea level.
>
> QuikScat found maximum air temperatures at the time of melting were
> unusually high, reaching more than 5 C in one of the areas. These maximum
> temperatures remained above the melting point for approximately a week.
>
> The researchers were led by Son Nghiem of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
> and Konrad Steffen, the director of the Co-operative Institute for Research
> in Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado. They published
> their results in a book, Dynamic Planet.
>
> "Antarctica has shown little to no warming in the recent past, with the
> exception of the Antarctic Peninsula, but now large regions are showing the
> first signs of the impacts of warming as interpreted by this satellite
> analysis," said Steffen in a statement.
>
> "Increases in snowmelt, such as this in 2005, definitely could have an
> impact on larger-scale melting of Antarctica's ice sheets if they were
> severe or sustained over time."
>
> The 2005 melt was extensive enough to create a layer of ice when the water
> refroze, but was not long enough for the water to flow to the sea. Steffen
> said if enough water from melted snow is created, it could slip through the
> cracks of the continent's ice sheets and potentially affect their movement.
>
> The Antarctic ice mass is the Earth's largest freshwater reserve, and
> changes in its condition can have an impact on sea levels, ocean salinity
> and water currents.
>
> "We need to know what's coming in and going out of the ice sheets," said
> Ngheim.
>
> "QuikScat data, combined with data from NASA's IceSat and Gravity Recovery
> and Climate Experiment satellites, along with aircraft and ground
> measurements, all contribute to more accurate estimates of how the polar ice
> sheets are changing."
On Apr 6, 2:27 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
<J...@E...com> wrote:
> "00BNZ" <0...@d...com> wrote
>
> >http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/pa
pers/reprint/schul...
>
> Produced by Fred Singer, who claimed that Phobos the moon of mars, was an
> alien spacecraft and who was employed by Big Tobacco to write opinion pieces
> that claimed that smoking didn't cause cancer.
>
> AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH.....
>
> MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
>
> NASA finds evidence of widespread Antarctic melting
> Last Updated: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 | 10:04 AM ET
>
> Rising temperatures two years ago led to widespread melting of snow cover in
> west Antarctica, according to scientists examining the impact of global
> warming on the icy continent.
>
> The melting of snow cover in regions in January 2005 was the most
> significant Antarctic melting seen since satellites began observing the
> continent three decades ago, NASA said Tuesday.
>
> NASA's QuikScat satellite detected extensive areas of snowmelt, shown in
> yellow and red, in west Antarctica in January 2005.
> (NASA/JPL) It was also the first major melting detected using NASA's
> QuikScat satellite, which can measure both accumulated snowfall and
> temperatures in various regions.
>
> The team of scientists found evidence of melting in regions not normally
> affected: up to 900 kilometres inland from the open ocean, farther than 85
> degrees south (within 500 kilometres of the South Pole) and higher than
> 2,000 metres above sea level.
>
> QuikScat found maximum air temperatures at the time of melting were
> unusually high, reaching more than 5 C in one of the areas. These maximum
> temperatures remained above the melting point for approximately a week.
>
> The researchers were led by Son Nghiem of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
> and Konrad Steffen, the director of the Co-operative Institute for Research
> in Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado. They published
> their results in a book, Dynamic Planet.
>
> "Antarctica has shown little to no warming in the recent past, with the
> exception of the Antarctic Peninsula, but now large regions are showing the
> first signs of the impacts of warming as interpreted by this satellite
> analysis," said Steffen in a statement.
>
> "Increases in snowmelt, such as this in 2005, definitely could have an
> impact on larger-scale melting of Antarctica's ice sheets if they were
> severe or sustained over time."
>
> The 2005 melt was extensive enough to create a layer of ice when the water
> refroze, but was not long enough for the water to flow to the sea. Steffen
> said if enough water from melted snow is created, it could slip through the
> cracks of the continent's ice sheets and potentially affect their movement.
>
> The Antarctic ice mass is the Earth's largest freshwater reserve, and
> changes in its condition can have an impact on sea levels, ocean salinity
> and water currents.
>
> "We need to know what's coming in and going out of the ice sheets," said
> Ngheim.
>
> "QuikScat data, combined with data from NASA's IceSat and Gravity Recovery
> and Climate Experiment satellites, along with aircraft and ground
> measurements, all contribute to more accurate estimates of how the polar ice
> sheets are changing."
"00BNZ" <0...@d...com> wrote
> http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2357
Ahahahahahaha.. The BLOG "Newspaper" that claims that the 911 was a MAFIA
hit.
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
NASA finds evidence of widespread Antarctic melting
Last Updated: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 | 10:04 AM ET
Rising temperatures two years ago led to widespread melting of snow cover in
west Antarctica, according to scientists examining the impact of global
warming on the icy continent.
The melting of snow cover in regions in January 2005 was the most
significant Antarctic melting seen since satellites began observing the
continent three decades ago, NASA said Tuesday.
NASA's QuikScat satellite detected extensive areas of snowmelt, shown in
yellow and red, in west Antarctica in January 2005.
(NASA/JPL) It was also the first major melting detected using NASA's
QuikScat satellite, which can measure both accumulated snowfall and
temperatures in various regions.
The team of scientists found evidence of melting in regions not normally
affected: up to 900 kilometres inland from the open ocean, farther than 85
degrees south (within 500 kilometres of the South Pole) and higher than
2,000 metres above sea level.
QuikScat found maximum air temperatures at the time of melting were
unusually high, reaching more than 5 C in one of the areas. These maximum
temperatures remained above the melting point for approximately a week.
The researchers were led by Son Nghiem of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
and Konrad Steffen, the director of the Co-operative Institute for Research
in Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado. They published
their results in a book, Dynamic Planet.
"Antarctica has shown little to no warming in the recent past, with the
exception of the Antarctic Peninsula, but now large regions are showing the
first signs of the impacts of warming as interpreted by this satellite
analysis," said Steffen in a statement.
"Increases in snowmelt, such as this in 2005, definitely could have an
impact on larger-scale melting of Antarctica's ice sheets if they were
severe or sustained over time."
The 2005 melt was extensive enough to create a layer of ice when the water
refroze, but was not long enough for the water to flow to the sea. Steffen
said if enough water from melted snow is created, it could slip through the
cracks of the continent's ice sheets and potentially affect their movement.
The Antarctic ice mass is the Earth's largest freshwater reserve, and
changes in its condition can have an impact on sea levels, ocean salinity
and water currents.
"We need to know what's coming in and going out of the ice sheets," said
Ngheim.
"QuikScat data, combined with data from NASA's IceSat and Gravity Recovery
and Climate Experiment satellites, along with aircraft and ground
measurements, all contribute to more accurate estimates of how the polar ice
sheets are changing."
"00BNZ" <0...@d...com> wrote
> http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/pap
ers/reprint/schulte_two_colmun_fomat.pdf
Produced by Fred Singer, who claimed that Phobos the moon of mars, was an
alien spacecraft and who was employed by Big Tobacco to write opinion pieces
that claimed that smoking didn't cause cancer.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH.....
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
NASA finds evidence of widespread Antarctic melting
Last Updated: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 | 10:04 AM ET
Rising temperatures two years ago led to widespread melting of snow cover in
west Antarctica, according to scientists examining the impact of global
warming on the icy continent.
The melting of snow cover in regions in January 2005 was the most
significant Antarctic melting seen since satellites began observing the
continent three decades ago, NASA said Tuesday.
NASA's QuikScat satellite detected extensive areas of snowmelt, shown in
yellow and red, in west Antarctica in January 2005.
(NASA/JPL) It was also the first major melting detected using NASA's
QuikScat satellite, which can measure both accumulated snowfall and
temperatures in various regions.
The team of scientists found evidence of melting in regions not normally
affected: up to 900 kilometres inland from the open ocean, farther than 85
degrees south (within 500 kilometres of the South Pole) and higher than
2,000 metres above sea level.
QuikScat found maximum air temperatures at the time of melting were
unusually high, reaching more than 5 C in one of the areas. These maximum
temperatures remained above the melting point for approximately a week.
The researchers were led by Son Nghiem of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
and Konrad Steffen, the director of the Co-operative Institute for Research
in Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado. They published
their results in a book, Dynamic Planet.
"Antarctica has shown little to no warming in the recent past, with the
exception of the Antarctic Peninsula, but now large regions are showing the
first signs of the impacts of warming as interpreted by this satellite
analysis," said Steffen in a statement.
"Increases in snowmelt, such as this in 2005, definitely could have an
impact on larger-scale melting of Antarctica's ice sheets if they were
severe or sustained over time."
The 2005 melt was extensive enough to create a layer of ice when the water
refroze, but was not long enough for the water to flow to the sea. Steffen
said if enough water from melted snow is created, it could slip through the
cracks of the continent's ice sheets and potentially affect their movement.
The Antarctic ice mass is the Earth's largest freshwater reserve, and
changes in its condition can have an impact on sea levels, ocean salinity
and water currents.
"We need to know what's coming in and going out of the ice sheets," said
Ngheim.
"QuikScat data, combined with data from NASA's IceSat and Gravity Recovery
and Climate Experiment satellites, along with aircraft and ground
measurements, all contribute to more accurate estimates of how the polar ice
sheets are changing."
| « Previous thread | Next thread » |
SOME BASTARDS DO NOT SEEM TO LIKE THEIR MINING PIONEERS VERY MUCH ! Let's Pray then !!!
Re: Latest RSS Satellite Data Show Continued Warming.
Global Cooling News: Record Cold In Saskatoon
Re: Big is back: As pump prices plunge, SUV sales surge
Re: 2008: Another Grim Year for the Global Warmers
Hey Coppcock, You Can Stop Hyperventilating Over Antarctica!
A Response To Coppcock's Incessant BOOGA BOOGA!
Re: Glacier Melt Impact on Sea Level Rise Underestimated
Re: Wilkins Ice Shelf disintegrating
Up