Re: 5th warmest October on NASA's 129-year long list of Northern Hemisphere data.

Home › Groups › aus.invest › Re: 5th warmest October on NASA's 129-year long list of Northern Hemisphere data.

Number of messages in the thread: 2

1. Date: 2008-11-18 03:19:02
Subject: Re: 5th warmest October on NASA's 129-year long list of Northern Hemisphere data.
From: "nbzoo" <n...@...com> Search message by this author

"Roger Coppock" <r...@a...com> wrote in message
news:46419c73-bacd-40b2-8841-138c8548d9ae@r15g2000pr
h.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 17, 4:27 pm, Whata Fool <w...@f...ami> wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Doesn't that just mean the "norm" selected happens to include
> a couple of decades of really remarkably cold temperatures?

No. The norm was selected to be near the mean.
It's just a connivence.
****************************************

No. The norm was selected to magnify any apparent warming because it was a
period of global cooling.
It's just a scam.

Warmest Regards

Bonzo

Show messages with headings

2. Date: 2008-11-20 16:27:07
Subject: Re: 5th warmest October on NASA's 129-year long list of Northern Hemisphere data.
From: "V for Vendicar" <E...@h...com> Search message by this author

"nbzoo" <n...@...com> wrote
> No. The norm was selected to magnify any apparent warming because it was
> a period of global cooling.

What was the rate of this cooling during the period that you claim?

Why do you think that using the mean is a conspiracy to make the observed
warming appear larger than your KKKonservative Stomach can handle?

Gawad must have arranged it that way.