Re: First six months of 2008 set record for precipitation

Home › Groups › aus.invest › Re: First six months of 2008 set record for precipitation › Re: First six months of 2008 set record for precipitation

From: "0Z0NB" <0...@d...com>
Newsgroups: aus.invest,alt.global-warming,sci.environment,aus.politics,sci.skeptic,sc
i.geo.meteorology,alt.energy.renewable,alt.politics.bush,alt.conspiracy
References: <C493C79F.12F485%evleth@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: First six months of 2008 set record for precipitation
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 14:06:37 +1000
Lines: 34
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.244.84.182
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.244.84.182
Message-ID: <487044c7$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>
X-Trace: dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au 1215317191 220.244.84.182 (6 Jul 2008 14:06:31
+1000)
Path: atlantis.news.neostrada.pl!news.neostrada.pl!newsfeed.neostrada.pl!news.nask.pl
!news.nask.org.pl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!so
lnet.ch!solnet.ch!nntp.gblx.net!nntp3.phx1!dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au!not-for
-mail
Xref: atlantis.news.neostrada.pl aus.invest:118107 alt.global-warming:267623
sci.environment:452150 aus.politics:1266235 sci.skeptic:401760
sci.geo.meteorology:47007 alt.energy.renewable:90002 alt.politics.bush:4847884
alt.conspiracy:907312
Hide headings

"Earl Evleth" <e...@w...fr> wrote in message
news:C493C79F.12F485%evleth@wanadoo.fr...
> Global warming news from Illinois

Maybe global cooling news?

> First six months of 2008 set record for precipitation
> Monthly statewide rainfall has been above average every month in the
> first
> half of 2008, resulting in the wettest January through June since
> 1895,
> according to the Illinois Water Survey at the Institute of Natural
> Resources
> Sustainability at the University of Illinois.
>

Ho hum, deja vu.
So it was similar in 1895!
What else is new?

Oh BTW, wasn't this AGW caper supposed to cause more extensive drought
conditions??

Warmest Regards

Bonzo

". none of the climate states in the models correspond even remotely to
the current observed climate. In particular, the state of the oceans,
sea ice, and soil moisture has no relationship to the observed state at
any recent time in any of the IPCC models." Kevin Trenberth, IPCC
Coordinating Lead Author