|
|||||
| « Previous thread | Next thread » |
"Roger Coppock" <r...@a...com> wrote in message
news:837770b9-4e70-4fae-8d95-54926a5516bf@z66g2000hs
c.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 4, 12:04 pm, Tunderbar <t...@g...com> wrote:
> http://ultimateglobalwarmingchallenge.com/
Rules number 3 and 8 tell the story.
3 JunkScience.com, in its sole discretion, will determine the winner,
if any, from UGWC entries. All determinations made by JunkScience.com
are final.
8 A fee of $15 is required for each entry submitted. There will be no
refunds of entry fees.
******************
ROTFLMAO
Not willing to spend $15 to prove your scam and collect $500,000?
Maybe it's not "settled" after all!
--
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"If scientists say they are 100% sure, or that they are absolutely
certain about the cause and effect and ignore variables which might show
that they could be wrong, they are practicing junk science. Junk science
happens when scientists believe something based on just some of what
they see."
| « Previous thread | Next thread » |
Australian Politician's Blind Faith In Bunkum Climate Models Is Too Scary For Words
The Political Dangers Of A Whacko Climate Crusade
Random Global Warming Nonsense
Re: First six months of 2008 set record for precipitation
www.perfectsure.com.sell nike air jordan,converse,dunk,bap e,prada,shox r3,polo T-shirt,Timberland.
Australian Telstra , and police lets Christian terrorist post bomb threats online AGAIN